The dilemmas we face

I have had Clarence Fisher’s post on Censorship, Audience, and International Collaboration on my mind ever since he posted it last Thursday. He had some tough decisions to make in his classroom. The dilemma was about a video his kids had created that Clarence said was “Powerful, overtly critical, and possibly in poor taste.” You need to read his post to get the full story and see the video but  Clarence had to make a decision that he still questions as to whether he  did the correct thing in requiring them to make changes……
He phrased it that he “pulled rank on them and told them that they had to edit the piece with the picture out.” He explained that it was being too critical and possibly insensitive or inflammatory towards their audience. In the end, the students decided to edit the video and revise it in ways they felt were more effective.

I think Clarence made the right call. I do know I would have made the same call. But I don’t view Clarence as pulling rank in this situation. I see it as a responsible call made by a caring and responsible teacher. In his post this sentence grabbed my attention:

“The kids producing the piece were never sure, leaning one way and then the other, they could not decide what to do.”

This shows the power of classroom discourse. It is clear that there was much classroom discussion and I have found time and again that this is what blogging and these type of local and global collaborations foster. This is where we have opportunities  to get kids engaged in critical thinking and participating in difficult discussions that really make them think because they are front and center in the involvement. This really wasn’t pulling rank because these kids had ownership of the dilemma. The teacher is the one to make the final call on such dilemmas but I am sure the kids understood his call. Plus the fact that he blogged about it and they can read his thoughts there shows the transparency of the learning with students and teacher. That’s powerful stuff. Just think about what he is teaching and modeling. Yes indeed, powerful stuff.
I find myself facing dilemmas constantly at the elementary level. There is much to think about and consider. I also find that the classroom discourses are of paramount importance. Blogging and videos afford us the opportunity to teach responsible public writing and media production. Students and teachers can have meaningful and powerful discussions and learnings about the power of the published word and the responsibilities involved with its public nature. That I would submit is good teaching and transforming teaching and learning, all of which Clarence exemplifies so very well.

5 Responses to “The dilemmas we face”

  1. Clarence Fisher Says:

    First of all, thanks for the kind words, they are, as always, much appreciated. I also thought you might be interested in knowing that we had a huge discussion in class today about censorship and about this exact issue. I showed both versions of the video and asked for their thoughts and opinions. I have also required that the kids write a blog post about censorship, giving examples of things that have been censored, their opinion of censorship in general, and I have also asked them to write about this issue and if they think I was right in requiring changes to be made to the video. They have until this Friday (April 27th) to complete the task. I am interested to see what they have to say.

  2. Anne Davis Says:

    I can’t wait to read what they have to say! This is terrific! Thanks for sharing…..

  3. Andrew Pass Says:

    Your post reminds me of a book by Tim Lensmire entitled, “When Children Write: Critical Revisions of the Writing Workshop.” HEre’s the citation: Lensmire, T. (1994). When children write: Critical re-visions of the writing workshop. New York: Teachers College Press.

  4. Anne Davis Says:

    Andrew,
    Thanks for the citation. I plan to look it up.

  5. OLDaily[中文版] » Blog Archive » 2007å¹´4月25æ—¥ Says:

    […] 检查制度、听众和国际合作 Clarence Fisher努力解决一些词汇和意象在这段时间法律可接受度界限上的问题。 人们不止检查那些令人反感和受伤害的词汇和意象,也一遍又一遍地检查那些他们不希望听到的消息。我认为这些情况落入了那样一个范畴,即当一个班级使用了一项公开的视频服务,例如DivShare,去分发一条非常有用的消息,与其同时产生了一个为提醒注意事项的更大的需求。但是我认为附加注意事项与过度的表达是同样有害的。不论如何,我会认可这个比喻–它不是天生让人反感的,它表达的仅是一个观点,并且实际上是一个非常缜密的论点的部分。也可看看Anne Davis关于这个问题的文章。Clarence Fisher, Remote Access April 25, 2007 [原文链接] [标签: Video, Ontologies] [参与评论] […]

Leave a Reply