<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions to answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anne.teachesme.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/</link>
	<description>Comments, reflections and occasional brainstorms</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.4-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lani Ritter Hall</title>
		<link>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Lani Ritter Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 02:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;What follows is definitely not from someone in a leadership position, but from someone who spent 35 years in a classroom setting. And I think my experience speaks to the eloquent answers you have written. 



I left the classroom for 3 years in 1998 for a position in the instructional technology office of a large urban district because I thought at that time that technology had enhanced so much in my classroom. Three years later, I returned to the classroom; I had slowly become very aware that it was not the technology but the pedagogy that had altered the learning in my classroom. My mindset as an educator was been profoundly altered. In my classroom, my role was dramatically adjusted from "sage on the stage" to a "guide on the side," from "giver of information" to designer of learning experiences. As my youngsters eagerly anticipated the new learning experiences I designed, I implemented more authentic, project-based lessons. I tried to change the face of the how I taught, what I taught, and how I requested evidence of student mastery. The technology had been a transparent tool. The transformation you speak of from &#8222;traditional&#8240; classrooms to those in which students &#8222;are regularly engaged in authentic, multidisciplinary learning tasks., where collaboration is a regular part of teaching, learning, and assessment, and collaborative relationships are common among students and staff, where students are flexibly grouped based on interest and need, and these groupings often cross grade-level boundaries, and where the teacher is the primary architect of the learning environment and purposefully facilitates student learning with overt strategies for nurturing student independence is critical if our children are to be productive citizens in our global world.  (The last sentence adapted from &lt;a href="http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/framewk/efp/environ/efpenvco.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/framewk/efp/environ/efpenvco.htm&lt;/a&gt;)



I would agree that learning occurs in any environment and I would add that a nurturing environment, one that recognizes and addresses the fears of those resistant to change, one that shapes new behaviors, one that provides significant, meaningful and effective professional development, one that supports with suggestions and "Teflon lessons," one that sends the message to educators 'you are valued, you are an educator', will empower educators becoming the wind beneath their wings as they then seek to change the way children learn, what children learn, and how children share what they know using technology.  That doesn&#8218;t speak to how to plan the environment but perhaps a vision of??  



Those many years ago, we all were very isolated as teachers. Had I had the opportunities for collaboration and learning, made possible with today&#8218;s technology, I would have been a much better educator much sooner and my students would certainly have benefited from that collaboration.  Your suggestion for blogging and collaboration, in my mind, is of such value.  The sharing, thinking, and reflecting that comes from such collaboration may help us achieve that transformation of which you speak.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>What follows is definitely not from someone in a leadership position, but from someone who spent 35 years in a classroom setting. And I think my experience speaks to the eloquent answers you have written. </p>
<p>I left the classroom for 3 years in 1998 for a position in the instructional technology office of a large urban district because I thought at that time that technology had enhanced so much in my classroom. Three years later, I returned to the classroom; I had slowly become very aware that it was not the technology but the pedagogy that had altered the learning in my classroom. My mindset as an educator was been profoundly altered. In my classroom, my role was dramatically adjusted from &#8220;sage on the stage&#8221; to a &#8220;guide on the side,&#8221; from &#8220;giver of information&#8221; to designer of learning experiences. As my youngsters eagerly anticipated the new learning experiences I designed, I implemented more authentic, project-based lessons. I tried to change the face of the how I taught, what I taught, and how I requested evidence of student mastery. The technology had been a transparent tool. The transformation you speak of from &#8222;traditional&#8240; classrooms to those in which students &#8222;are regularly engaged in authentic, multidisciplinary learning tasks., where collaboration is a regular part of teaching, learning, and assessment, and collaborative relationships are common among students and staff, where students are flexibly grouped based on interest and need, and these groupings often cross grade-level boundaries, and where the teacher is the primary architect of the learning environment and purposefully facilitates student learning with overt strategies for nurturing student independence is critical if our children are to be productive citizens in our global world.  (The last sentence adapted from <a href="http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/framewk/efp/environ/efpenvco.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/framewk/efp/environ/efpenvco.htm</a>)</p>
<p>I would agree that learning occurs in any environment and I would add that a nurturing environment, one that recognizes and addresses the fears of those resistant to change, one that shapes new behaviors, one that provides significant, meaningful and effective professional development, one that supports with suggestions and &#8220;Teflon lessons,&#8221; one that sends the message to educators &#8216;you are valued, you are an educator&#8217;, will empower educators becoming the wind beneath their wings as they then seek to change the way children learn, what children learn, and how children share what they know using technology.  That doesn&#8218;t speak to how to plan the environment but perhaps a vision of??  </p>
<p>Those many years ago, we all were very isolated as teachers. Had I had the opportunities for collaboration and learning, made possible with today&#8218;s technology, I would have been a much better educator much sooner and my students would certainly have benefited from that collaboration.  Your suggestion for blogging and collaboration, in my mind, is of such value.  The sharing, thinking, and reflecting that comes from such collaboration may help us achieve that transformation of which you speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Boora</title>
		<link>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Boora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I think you have got it right with the comments that the way that learning is thought to happen best (in rows and assessed by exams that are not within the same context of the what is being assessed - MC for answers that require critical thought and synthesis) is now increasing showing it's age.



The networked learning environment is where we should be heading - if for no other reason than it is also the way that business is going.  Not that I'm a fan of following the business crowd, but it is easier to point to "the real world" to get parents and administrators to change things in schools than it is to point to theories from the Ivory Tower. 



That being said, until education gets more priority, it is not likely that things will change as the status quo is cheap and for a generation fits to the mould of "that is how I was taught".



The only thing that I would add to your piece of advice is that usually the simple solutions work best and if you start simple, success follows quickly and if there is a failure, it's easy to recover.  I would also add that in taking simple steps it's even easier to beg forgiveness should the need for that arise as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I think you have got it right with the comments that the way that learning is thought to happen best (in rows and assessed by exams that are not within the same context of the what is being assessed - MC for answers that require critical thought and synthesis) is now increasing showing it&#8217;s age.</p>
<p>The networked learning environment is where we should be heading - if for no other reason than it is also the way that business is going.  Not that I&#8217;m a fan of following the business crowd, but it is easier to point to &#8220;the real world&#8221; to get parents and administrators to change things in schools than it is to point to theories from the Ivory Tower. </p>
<p>That being said, until education gets more priority, it is not likely that things will change as the status quo is cheap and for a generation fits to the mould of &#8220;that is how I was taught&#8221;.</p>
<p>The only thing that I would add to your piece of advice is that usually the simple solutions work best and if you start simple, success follows quickly and if there is a failure, it&#8217;s easy to recover.  I would also add that in taking simple steps it&#8217;s even easier to beg forgiveness should the need for that arise as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anne.teachesme.com/2005/11/12/questions-to-answer/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I've been doing a lot of conferences recently where I have been (perhaps unduly) surprised at the number of teachers proactively seeking to change the way they teach. They know their traditional ways are less relevant but are clearly not getting the guidance they require from their local support agencies or colleagues. Your point about reading blogs and responding to points in your own blog is an important one - the support networks we have relied upon thus far, including Local Authorities and national training programmes, provide untimely information that is out of date or lagging behind the times. They do tend to ignore new technologies that are easy to use - like blogging and podcasting - because they see them as a threat. The blogging community is one group who a) generally know what they're trying to do, b) will always provide help to fellow bloggers in need, c) keep up-to-date in terms of "the tech and the teach", the kit and the pedagogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I&#8217;ve been doing a lot of conferences recently where I have been (perhaps unduly) surprised at the number of teachers proactively seeking to change the way they teach. They know their traditional ways are less relevant but are clearly not getting the guidance they require from their local support agencies or colleagues. Your point about reading blogs and responding to points in your own blog is an important one - the support networks we have relied upon thus far, including Local Authorities and national training programmes, provide untimely information that is out of date or lagging behind the times. They do tend to ignore new technologies that are easy to use - like blogging and podcasting - because they see them as a threat. The blogging community is one group who a) generally know what they&#8217;re trying to do, b) will always provide help to fellow bloggers in need, c) keep up-to-date in terms of &#8220;the tech and the teach&#8221;, the kit and the pedagogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
